مجتبی؛ فقط یک دکور بینقش
Transcript Tap any line to jump the video to that moment 0:00 It's worth watching this again — look. He first says the military makes the decisions 0:03 and then when asked about Mojtaba, see how he tries to deflect the discussion. 0:07 But it seemed like a very clumsy move, and maybe even intentional, because 0:11 if he'd said anything other than this thing — if he had stayed silent, it wouldn't have drawn so much attention. Listen 0:15 to this sentence of his, then I'll explain. He doesn't think you can gamble with the fate of 0:19 the country, with people's lives. I want to say the military agreed. Meaning the main matter is the military's. So the ceasefire 0:25 was Mr. Mojtaba's call then? Is this tea for drinking or just a stage prop? No, you drink it, 0:29 it's getting cold. Aha. He doesn't think that — well, did you notice? 0:35 He asks whether the military agreed with the ceasefire. He says the main matter is the military's. Meaning throw 0:40 the rest away. Now he himself explains elsewhere in this conversation that the decisions 0:44 were made by the Supreme National Security Council. Then he describes the composition of the National Security Council and 0:51 its duties. He says there are political officials, the country's economic officials, the foreign minister is there to reflect 0:57 the decisions abroad, and now from his own view he also says how isolated are we 1:02 really? Then he suddenly corrects himself, or we're not isolated, what about regional issues? But ultimately he says 1:07 a group of the regime's political, military and economic leaders are on the Supreme National Security Council, they 1:14 decide, and he says the ceasefire is contingent on them. Then — but here he says the main 1:19 decision-makers are the military, and when he's asked, so was it based on Mr. Mojtaba's view? 1:23 He says, is this tea a prop or for drinking? 1:28 I can't assume that, say, Abbas Araghchi was doing this just to dodge 1:33 responsibility — actually, in my view it was coordinated, because he's especially skilled at handling such matters, 1:37 very experienced. In a way, he raised the point deliberately to draw attention to the fact that Mr. Mojtaba 1:41 is also just a prop. Meaning as soon as he's asked whether the ceasefire was decided 1:46 based on Mr. Mojtaba's view, he says, is this tea a prop or for drinking? 1:51 So he's implying that even now Mojtaba's role is merely decorative. So if in two, or 1:57 three months, or even one month from now it becomes known that three 2:01 months ago Mojtaba was killed, know that, sir, Mojtaba never really had a role at all — the military decides. Until 2:06 now Mojtaba has been decorative, if he even existed at all, and if one day they announce he died 2:11 or was killed again, now in some future operation, people shouldn't worry. The same people who 2:15 have been running things until now will keep running things afterward too. Don't move an inch from where you 2:18 are.
Caption "Is this tea for drinking or just stage decor?" 🫖
Right when the question about Mojtaba's role comes up, the conversation gets deflected with one strange line — and that deflection says everything.
Asked if the military approved the ceasefire, the answer is telling: "The military is what matters" — implying everyone else is just decoration on the stage.
A clumsy slip or a deliberate diversion? Watch it again closely and decide for yourself. 👇
Drop your thoughts in the comments.
منبع / Source: https://youtu.be/JavJSa9OaVY?t=1319#مجتبی_خامنهای #عراقچی #آتش_بس #ایران #سیاست_ایران #شورای_امنیت_ملی #تحلیل_سیاسی #اخبار_ایران #نظامی #IranPolitics #Iran #Mojtaba #Araghchi #Ceasefire #IRGC #MiddleEast #IranNews #PoliticalAnalysis #BreakingNews #Tehran #IranianRegime #Quotable #ViralClip #WatchAgain
