توافق مثل اعتراف زیر شکنجه
Transcript Tap any line to jump the video to that moment 0:00 — should we give it up? Isn't that a paradox? Yes, friends, we've always said the reformist faction exists precisely for this, 0:08 for playing games with these matters at various points in the history of the Islamic Republic — they are cunning. 0:14 They are, so to speak, more devious characters. And now Mohsen Hashemi is saying, "Sir, why 0:20 this angry bull" — meaning Trump — he's provoked the bull. "The angry bull" is something a bit — 0:28 something we should give him to a certain degree, sign an agreement with him. Then once 0:35 his term is over — he's not president forever — once he's gone we'll come out and say, 0:40 'Sir, excuse us, we signed that agreement under pressure.'" It's just like prisoners who say, "if under 0:47 torture." These are the political kids and journalists — 0:52 something we kept passing on to each other, the experience we had in Iran. Now if IRGC Intelligence raided 0:59 and took you, if they started beating you, say whatever you want, meaning confess — 1:07 make false confessions just to avoid being beaten, to avoid being tortured. But then once they'd 1:14 taken you to the interrogating judge, one level above the interrogator, you'd tell him it was under pressure and torture 1:20 and that would nullify all your previous statements. Because we already knew the people of Iran 1:26 also understood that a forced confession is one made under pressure and torture. That was already 1:30 an established idea in those last years. And of course, a lot of these kids arrested in the streets 1:37 — I later saw many of them in prison — hadn't given in to this at all. 1:40 and, poor things, had been badly mistreated. This Mohsen Hashemi and the reformist 1:47 faction see America exactly as that interrogator. They say, "Let's give him whatever he wants right now. 1:53 But later we'll say, 'Sir, we were under pressure, we were under duress.' After 1:58 Trump's term passes, we'll cancel it." Now regardless of how foolish that was, 2:03 how idiotic those words of Mohsen Hashemi's were — because if an agreement is eventually made, it won't be like the JCPOA 2:09 this time. One of the clauses of the agreement might be that a legal and 2:15 political mechanism is set up so that no future president can violate it. That is, it would count as America's 2:23 commitment. And the Americans would also want it to count as Iran's government's commitment, not 2:30 say, this or that leader's, this or that president's, this or that administration's. If they do that, then there'd be no use 2:36 in someone reneging after Trump either. But my point is these people who have always 2:41 tried to paint the regime's sparrow and sell it as a canary — the reformist faction —
Caption 🚨 A deal under pressure is like a confession under torture!
In this clip, a powerful metaphor unfolds: America as the interrogator, and a forced agreement as the confession extracted under duress — just like political prisoners told to "say whatever they want so you won't be beaten."
💬 "Once he's gone, we'll say sorry, we signed that agreement under pressure."
A sharp critique mixed with a raw personal account of prison experience.
👇 What do you think? Can a deal made under pressure ever be legitimate? Comment & share.
منبع / Source: https://youtu.be/gxhp9jY-pNE?t=1964#ایران #ترامپ #توافق #اصلاحطلبان #جمهوریاسلامی #سیاست #اخبار #تحلیلسیاسی #محسنهاشمی #زندانیسیاسی #آمریکا #برجام #Iran #Trump #IranDeal #Politics #MiddleEast #BreakingNews #IranPolitics #USA #PoliticalAnalysis #FreedomOfSpeech #Reels #ViralReels
