تناقض مذاکره و باجدهی رژیم
Transcript Tap any line to jump the video to that moment 0:00 The Islamists themselves are saying, sir, 0:04 all the ideals of our martyred leader—Khamenei, especially lately, particularly after this covenant 0:11 breaking by America and its withdrawal from the JCPOA—he insisted that we should not negotiate with them at all. 0:17 He rejected negotiation as a principle. Negotiation itself was the issue. Then we came under bombardment and military 0:25 threat, while they even killed our leader, they killed our figures too. We were forced, because of 0:32 the pressure America is putting on us militarily, to give in and accept negotiation. 0:37 But now, in negotiations, if we're going to give meaningful concessions, that means they 0:43 won't stop at that point. Because this is a contradiction. Right now, for instance, many friends are indeed 0:48 rightly asking—all this talk on the American side saying 'shame on Trump' 0:53 and Vance seriously. Why did it turn out this way? Why did they accept this deal so submissively, accept the memorandum of understanding? So 1:00 it was that much to America's detriment? Well then presumably the Islamic Republic has won. So why 1:06 on the Islamic Republic's side too, some people say we've retreated from our ideals? Look, 1:11 it's because the Islamic Republic's system of governance is entirely different—that is, in regimes similar to the Islamic Republic that 1:19 have tied their identity and their very existence to certain frameworks. These frameworks are very rigid and hard. 1:25 The Islamic Republic's frameworks are inflexible, and for example the notion of not giving concessions to America and 1:31 not negotiating has become an actual principle of governance for this—for regimes like this. Then they come 1:38 at a time when American planes and fighter jets come into the region and forcibly drag 1:46 the regime to the negotiating table—and now it's ended up like this, they even killed our leader. In other words, they said 1:52 this leader is very anti-negotiation, let's kill him, eliminate him, remove him from the path, and drag the rest 1:57 back to the negotiating table again through military threats, planes, and missiles. And up to 2:03 now, this is exactly what they've done. That is, up to this point, so many ideals, frameworks, and so much future 2:09 of the regime have burned away. The regime's own domestic supporters, despite these slogans, know that it has given in a great deal. 2:16 It has caved a lot—under the pressure of global arrogance it has submitted to disgrace and humiliation. Now come on 2:23 and in the negotiation points too, one by one it keeps giving in and retreating. This 2:29 is the same trench-by-trench retreat that they say will ultimately amount to the Islamic Republic's 'Libyanization.'
Caption The great paradox of negotiation: when concessions never end. 🔴
If meaningful concessions are made at the table, the other side won't stop there — that's the structural contradiction.
Why submit to talks under military pressure? And why do both sides claim victory? Watch this sharp analysis to the end. 🎯
👇 Drop your thoughts in the comments — does this cycle of concessions ever end?
منبع / Source: https://youtu.be/Dw_EM8N66ns?t=1494#مذاکره #سیاست #تحلیل_سیاسی #ایران #برجام #تناقض #دیپلماسی #اخبار #تنگه_هرمز #قالیباف #Iran #Negotiation #Diplomacy #Politics #MiddleEast #PoliticalAnalysis #Geopolitics #News #ForeignPolicy #IranPolitics #BreakingNews #StrategicAnalysis #Tehran #Washington
